🔦 Cluster Conundrum: Seeking Help from the Kubernetes Community

charm
, , ,
1

Hey there, fellow Kubernetes explorers! :rocket: We’ve encountered an intriguing challenge in our cluster journey and could use your wisdom to unravel the mystery. :male_detective:‍♂

Cluster Snapshot: We’re navigating a Kubernetes cluster with the mission of keeping our workers active and our services responsive. Our setup involves units like “kubernetes-worker-0” and “calico-2,” each running their status-update hooks with finesse. The goal? Keep those workers bustling and services purring. :smiley_cat:

Log Expedition: During our voyage, we’ve stumbled upon intriguing logs that reveal snippets of our cluster’s dance. Here’s a quick peek into the logbook:

vbnetCopy code

unit-kubernetes-worker-0: INFO status-set: active - Kubernetes worker running.
unit-kubernetes-worker-0: INFO ran "update-status" hook - bespoke script
unit-calico-2: INFO ran "update-status" hook - dispatching script
machine-2: ERROR "storage-provisioner" manifold worker - connection refused
machine-9: ERROR "storage-provisioner" manifold worker - connection refused

The Mystery Deepens: As we interpret the log glyphs, it seems our “storage-provisioner” manifold workers are having quite the tête-à-tête with the connection realm. They’re trying to reach a majestic "https://10.217.74.1:8443/1.0," but alas, they’re met with a resounding “connection refused.” :stop_sign::mag:

Intriguing Twists: Hold on, the plot thickens! Our detective work uncovers that even Juju itself is grappling with connecting to the API. Despite our best efforts, with everything appearing healthy and up in the cluster, this hiccup leaves us scratching our heads. :face_with_monocle:

Seeking the Sherlocks of Kubernetes: This is where you, the seasoned Kubernetes community, come in! We’d love your keen insights and expertise to help us decode this mystery. Any Sherlock-level deductions on why our “storage-provisioner” workers can’t connect would be greatly appreciated. Could it be a network hiccup, a misconfigured port, or perhaps a cunning firewall? :female_detective:

Feel free to dive into the logs and our cluster’s journey. Here’s the scoop:

  • Cluster IP: 10.217.74.1
  • Port: 8443
  • Kubernetes units in play: “kubernetes-worker-0,” “calico-2”

Let’s collaborate to crack this code and keep our Kubernetes odyssey sailing smoothly. Drop your insights, thoughts, or any clues you have in the comments below. Together, we’ll solve this cluster enigma! :bulb::globe_with_meridians: